Fix software bugs faster with Claude
Turn debugging from detective work into systematic problem-solving. Analyze errors, trace root causes, and implement fixes faster.

Learn how teams at NBIM, Brex, and more build reliable AI agents with Claude on AWS Bedrock.
Learn how teams at NBIM, Brex, and more build reliable AI agents with Claude on AWS Bedrock.
Learn how teams at NBIM, Brex, and more build reliable AI agents with Claude on AWS Bedrock.
Turn debugging from detective work into systematic problem-solving. Analyze errors, trace root causes, and implement fixes faster.
Debugging code is time-consuming and tedious. And the hardest part isn't usually fixing the bug itself; it’s understanding why your code broke in the first place.
Your test suite fails, but the error message points to a symptom, not the cause. A user reports unexpected behavior that traces back to code from three sprints ago. The real issue might be hiding in some dependency you forgot existed. Each bug pulls you out of flow state into detective mode, hunting through logs and stack traces when you'd rather be building.
Most teams debug the same way: dig through logs, reproduce locally, add more logging, then manually trace through recent changes. These methods work, but they're slow. Each step requires deep context about your system, and correlation work that stretches a 20-minute fix into a 3-hour investigation.
Here's how to turn debugging from detective work into systematic problem-solving.
The debugging process typically begins by examining application logs or stack traces. Using tools like Splunk or ELK, you correlate error messages across services, follow request flows, and piece together what happened during the failure window.
This works when error messages clearly point to the problematic code and your logs have enough business context, but production systems generate massive log volumes that need domain expertise to parse. Stack traces show where code failed, not why validation rules triggered or what external services returned.
Next, you create controlled test scenarios to recreate the production problem locally, where you can use breakpoints and step-through debugging. This means building reproduction setups with specific data and simulated user interactions.
Local reproduction gives you visibility into code execution, but many production issues only happen under specific conditions. Combinations of system load, third-party behavior, and real user data that staging environments can't replicate. Performance problems and race conditions behave completely differently under artificial test conditions.
When logs aren't enough, add logging statements around suspected problem areas, deploy observability improvements, and capture more granular system behavior during failures.
You'll gain valuable insights, but it requires production deployments that introduce risk and extend timelines. Debug logging impacts performance in high-traffic environments. The cycle of adding instrumentation, deploying, and waiting for reproduction often stretches debugging from hours to days.
You review recent commits, dependency updates, and configuration changes that coincided with issue emergence. This involves digging through Git histories, pull request discussions, and deployment logs to identify problematic modifications.
Thorough analysis can identify root causes, but modern deployment means dozens of changes reach production daily across multiple services. Complex issues span repositories and require understanding interactions between seemingly unrelated modifications.
Developers of all skill levels can integrate AI coding assistants like Claude into their debugging workflows for immediate error analysis. You can collaborate with Claude to debug in two different ways:
Before diving deep into your codebase, use Claude.ai to quickly analyze error patterns and generate investigation hypotheses. The web interface lets you paste stack traces, describe symptoms, and get immediate feedback. This first-pass analysis helps you understand what to look for before committing to time-intensive debugging approaches. Common debugging questions developers ask Claude:
These questions help you quickly validate theories, identify blind spots in your investigation, and prioritize which debugging approaches to try first.
Before diving into code, Claude helps you think through potential issues systematically. Ask Claude to identify scenarios that trigger specific errors: timeouts, rate limiting, missing fields.
Example: "What could cause pagination to silently drop results in this API call?"
Claude outlines common culprits like cursor mishandling, connection limits, race conditions. Get a focused set of issues to investigate instead of hunting blindly.
Paste cryptic error logs into Claude. Ask for "probable root causes ranked by likelihood."
Claude identifies patterns in error data, highlighting the specific service, configuration change, or code path that's responsible. Instead of "investigate API failures," your team gets "check rate limiting in auth service."
When bugs span your entire codebase, Claude Code acts as an autonomous debugging partner. Unlike traditional coding assistants that wait for instructions, Claude Code can independently explore your project, following debugging trails across files, and executing the investigative workflow a seasoned developer would take, all while you focus on other tasks.
Install:
npm install -g @anthropic-ai/claude-codeLaunch in your project:
claudeThen immediately start investigating:

Claude Code analyzes your entire codebase, examines dependencies, and provides specific reasons why checkout is failing. Typical debugging time drops from hours to minutes.
Some bugs require structured reasoning rather than direct debugging.
Try:
Claude breaks down problems systematically, identifies race conditions, and suggests mitigation strategies.
Once Claude Code identifies issues, it proposes targeted fixes that match your coding style and project conventions. Each suggestion follows your existing patterns and architectural decisions.
> Explain the changes you just madeEvery edit is local, permissioned, and reversible. By default, Claude Code requests permission before modifying files to ensure you maintain complete control over your codebase.
Claude Code generates and runs tests verifying the bug is resolved and surrounding behavior remains stable:
After tests pass, Claude Code handles the release process:
> Commit these changes and open a PRGenerates descriptive commit messages, crafts clear PR descriptions, links changes and tests.
Claude.ai: Ideal for quick error analysis, hypothesis generation, and understanding stack traces. Free web interface accessible from any browser, desktop, or mobile device. No setup required.
Claude Code: Built for autonomous debugging across large codebases. Handles multi-file investigations, and implements fixes. Requires npm installation and Claude API or Claude subscription.
Ramp uses Claude Code to accelerate delivery across hundreds of services.
Results:
"When we discovered Claude Code, our teams immediately recognized its potential and integrated it into our workflows," says Austin Ray, Senior Software Engineer.
Immediate debugging: Visit Claude.ai and paste your error message to get instant analysis from Claude Sonnet 4.5, our most intelligent model yet. Just describe your bug and get actionable insights in seconds.
Deep codebase investigation: When you're ready for autonomous debugging across your entire codebase, install Claude Code with a single command:
npm install -g @anthropic-ai/claude-codeOnce installed, describe the issue you're facing and partner with Claude to analyze your entire codebase, trace problems across multiple files, and implement targeted fixes. Claude Code handles the investigation while you stay focused on building.
Get the developer newsletter
Product updates, how-tos, community spotlights, and more. Delivered monthly to your inbox.
Get the developer newsletter
Product updates, how-tos, community spotlights, and more. Delivered monthly to your inbox.